×
shape
shape

Amritsar Medical College Faces ₹1 lakh Fine Over Arbitrary MBBS Admission Cancellation

🔴 Live Updates
Karnataka HC Restores JNMC's 200 MBBS Seats: A Major Relief Amid Bribery Allegations for 2025-26 Admissions (2025-09-05 13:58:25) Maharashtra Eyes Scrapping MBBS Bond Service: Graduates in 2025 Get Relief? (2025-09-05 17:36:04) SC Upholds MBBS Degree: Father Fined Rs 5 Lakh for False Caste Claim in 2025 (2025-09-05 18:33:18) 1-Year Compulsory Service Rule for PG Medical Students in Karnataka: For Bond Breach 50 Lakh Penalty (2025-09-05 18:52:28) Rajasthan Hikes PG Bond Penalty to ₹1.5 Crore in 2025: Specialties Facing the Highest Fines (2025-09-08 16:35:34) Karnataka MBBS Admissions 2025-26: 15% NRI Quota in Government Medical Colleges Explained (2025-09-08 17:14:33) SMVDIME Jammu & Kashmir Secures 50 MBBS Seats: LG Thanks PM Modi and JP Nadda (2025-09-09 18:46:51) Madras HC Greenlights PwD Doctor for NEET PG 2025 Counselling with 2024 Rank (2025-09-10 18:48:55) Physiotherapists Are Not Medical Doctors, No 'Dr.' for Them (2025-09-11 13:27:13) Joint Admission Process for MBA Launched by 4 IIMs, IIM Raipur to Coordinate: Details (2025-09-11 14:36:34) Why bond / surety policy of Punjab government for MBBS (and BDS) admissions is facing criticism? (2025-09-20 18:27:37) Indian Institute of Foreign Trade (IIFT), New Delhi (2025-09-25 15:48:24) Faculty of Management Studies (FMS), University of Delhi (2025-09-25 16:47:22) Latest Updates on Sri Sharada Institute of Indian Management Sexual Harassment Case (2025-09-25 18:52:52) FORE School of Management, Delhi – Detailed Evaluation (2025-09-26 18:27:47) Significance of Student Credit Cards Offered by Different States of India (2025-09-27 16:00:42) Latest Updates on Sri Sharada Institute Sexual Harassment Case (2025-09-27 17:56:25)
Blog Image
 
 Editor: Bodmas Research   Published at:  2025-01-30 15:09:26  

Punjab-Haryana High Court Reinstates MBBS Admission, Upholds Freedom Fighter Quota Rights

Freedom Fighter Quota: The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently delivered a landmark judgment reinstating the admission of an MBBS student, Samarveer Singh, whose admission to Government Medical College, Amritsar, had been arbitrarily canceled. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, emphasizing that the Freedom Fighter category must be extended to both biological and adopted children, as per existing legal provisions.

Background of the Case

Samarveer Singh had secured admission under the Freedom Fighter category in Government Medical College, Amritsar, for the 2024-25 academic session. Despite obtaining a valid seat through the counselling process conducted by Baba Farid University of Health Sciences (BFUHS), his admission was later revoked by the college administration. The cancellation was based on the argument that his father was an adopted son of a freedom fighter, and an outdated 1995 letter from the state government was cited to justify the decision.

Adopted child gets the same rights as a biological child

The High Court, presided over by Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel, examined the matter in detail. The court noted that:

    The prospectus for medical admissions explicitly provides a 1% reservation for children and grandchildren of freedom fighters without distinguishing between biological and adopted descendants.

    The state’s reliance on the 1995 letter was legally untenable, as the letter had been superseded by the latest government notifications and the admission prospectus.

    Under Section 12 of the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, an adopted child is entitled to the same rights as a biological child.

Amritsar Medical College Faces ₹1 L Fine

Consequently, the court quashed the admission cancellation order and directed the authorities to allow the petitioner to resume his MBBS course without any further obstruction. Furthermore, the court criticized the arbitrary cancellation as an act of misgovernance and imposed a fine of ₹1.5 lakh, with ₹50,000 payable to the petitioner and ₹1,00,000 to be deposited in the Poor Patient’s Welfare Fund at PGIMER, Chandigarh.

Non-discrimination in reservation policies

This ruling sets a crucial precedent, reinforcing the fundamental principles of equality and non-discrimination in reservation policies. It highlights that government authorities must adhere strictly to legally binding admission guidelines rather than relying on outdated administrative directives. Moreover, the judgment upholds the rights of adopted children under reservation policies, ensuring they are treated on par with biological descendants.

Powered by Froala Editor

shape

We're Here to Help

Bodmas
  • Bodmas AI Bodmas-Logo
; WhatsApp Chat